I feel sorrow for the families of both victims, and shooters family. It is a hard thing to accept on both sides. That a friend or family member uselessly had their life terminated, or suffered injury. Some of which could prove to be a life altering thing. I am certain the memory will always be life changing. The shooter’s family, because it has to be hard to accept the fact that someone you knew,cared for, and LOVED, could possibly be involved in such a cowardly act. By the way ISIS has reportedly admitted they were behind the attack. CAN YOU SAY “TERRORIST”? Apparently Barack nor Hillary can’t. Hillary and her gun hating lemmings will have a field day with this one as they always do. It seems they look forward to unfortunate events, (I don’t particular like to use “event” here but, I think it adequately fits, the way Hillary/Barack look at this); It gives them a exvuse to strut their DIS-ARMING AMERICA agenda. I can’t help but wonder how they would feel if the people they have guarding them were to suddenly lose the guns. Then the agents would not be there. I can’t afford to hire people to be my personal guards. That would put them on equal ground with me. Walking around in a city or country side with no means to protect me from harm. Many times I read of people in perfectly NICE neighborhoods being injured or killed. Not just guns,…. But Knives, Arrows, Strangulation, Arson. Beaten to death, just to name a few. Many times when I go to major sporting events, or Conventions, I must make my way on dark streets, or by alleyways, or even recessed doorways. AND don’t give me that old “police presence” will protect me. I could be attacked and my assailant far away before the nearest police officer could come to my aid. BUT, if I get to my destination I most likely not be allowed to have any means of protection on me. Thus I am open to attack. Excuse me for straying a little, however I believe it is important in relating my feeling on these MASS KILLINGS. 1. Have these anti gun people realized. MOST ALL, of these mass killings have been in “gun free” zones. Schools, Churches, even Government buildings, or annexes. Cowards will take a path of least resistance. FIFTY people killed. I just can’t help but wonder why so many killed and injured before police arrived. After all according to the anti gun people this is why we have them to protect and prevent something like this from happening. Always in the right place at the right time. (Apparently even after they arrived). Perhaps if one or two of the patrons, or employees had a a legally permited GUN; MAYBE, JUST, one of them could have stopped the perpetrator, before all of the death and injury. HOW, many people might still be alive? Uninjured? If only HALF of them, heck even one would have been saved. Isn’t that worth something? Apparently not according to those who want to be like Hitler, and those others whose first steps were to disarm the citizenry). GEE! Just think if the British had of thought of this we COULD all still be British subjects, OR overrun by some other country. 2. While, as a CHRISTIAN, I can’t condone homosexuality. But neither do I wish to give up my rights to them either. I, in fact, still can’t stop wondering if a boy in a neighboring school, of mine, who everyone knew was a homosexual, but no one I know of treated him any differently, BUT the fact that when he “hit the beach” of Viet Nam, It was reported he was the first one killed. Enemy coincidence, or was he killed by “friendly fire” I have always wondered about that. I am affronted by their constant public displays (as a group), (“LGBT”). It would appear to me, this group of people were not hurting anyone, they were not blatantly displaying their sexuality in anyone’s face, The assassin may have been known to some of the club attendees, as it was stated he was a “REGULAR” at the club. BUT it is not my place to judge them. That is up to GOD. I am not qualified to say what his Judgement will be. I guess I am more offended by what appears to me a CALL to put my religious beliefs on the back burner while demanding I accept their lifestyle. I treat all people equally, unless they give me reason not to. Being Homosexual is not one of them. But I would surely like to be able to use the word “GAY” properly, and not have it confused with homosexual . As it is now used, apparently everyone in the 1890’s were homosexual. “GAY NINETIES” We even had a little eating place “very small, really good food. The name was GAY DAN’S. ( meaning a fun place to eat, apparently owned by someone named DAN). When homosexuals became associated with the word “GAY” the small eating chain had to close it’s doors. 3. Need for more extensive background checks? EXCUSE ME! I believe the FBI investigated Omar Marteen at least 3 times, before he purchased his weapons. Why this didn’t trigger a flag on the background check is beyond me. That seems pretty EXTENSIVE to me. In the state where I live we have the NICS background check, even when purchasing a squirrel rifle. I also know IF there is a flag of something unverified, or whatevere reason, the inquiry comes back with a hold, ( I think of 5 or 7 days), so a more extensive background check can be made. 4. A woman I recall being interviewed about gun laws, stated, “All anyone has to do is go online and buy a gun and have it shipped to his door.” Ignorance of the law is no excuse. In my state, YES! I… Continue reading ORLANDO PULSE CLUB SHOOTING, MY THOUGHTS.
Tag: Christian
aclu (Anti Christian Lawyers Union) at it AGAIN
We all know how the ACLU is always proclaiming separation of state and CHURCH. That is what they claim anyway. However if it is in their best interest they do an about face. Now I believe in the beginning the ACLU had good intentions, and the ACLU stood for “American Civil Liberties Union” . But as many civic groups grow they become drunk with power. I think this is what has happened with the current aclu. Somewhere along the line they strayed from their original intent. Protect our CIVIL rights. Now it seems all they are intent on doing is to destroy our CIVIL rights in the name of the minority. No longer does the majority rule. Just as the NAZI’s Communistis, etc. I don’t know ,how but I suspect money has something to do with it. The ACLU become corrupt and the new aclu has the power to convince OUR supreme court to misinterpret our CONSTITUTION. Somehow Our Supreme Court appointees have either become corrupted or very badly misled. They no longer consider that the majority rules, only the minority rules. Back to what prompted this post. In case you missed it the aclu, after all their talk about separation of state and church now wants the government to tell private CHURCH owned HOSPITALS to go against their beliefs, You see it is okay for the STATE to do whatever they want but let’s not give the CHURCH and Christians any rights. Sort of sounds like Communism and Nazism doesn’t it. The aclu wants the State to force Catholic owned Hospitals to go against their core beliefs regarding abortion. If the aclu wins this one….. The aclu wants to force these Catholic owned facilities to perform ABORTIONS. It isn’t about what you an individual believe, either pro or con. It is about conscious. I for one think the aclu should build their own Hospitals. Surely their are enough Government owned health facilities to provide this procedure. It is my considered opinion, if aclu wins this I would be behind the Catholic Church if they decided to close all their Hospitals. WOW!! That would leave a gaping hole in health care community. Wouldn’t it? I know that in my city we would be without a hospital. Our nearest facility would be about 50 miles away. aclu you are in over your heads on this, back off and try to return to your original edicts of protecting OUR , meaning, protect the rights in the best interest of all and not just a small group. I feel I have the right to eat and enjoy public events without having to inhale someone’s second hand smoke. What are you doing about that. That Is How I see It Views: 603