Night is when you worry the most. I can feel it even when you are asleep. The way your concern stretches outward, trying to follow me through darkness like a thin blanket that never quite reaches far enough. You imagine danger. You imagine cold. You imagine things with teeth and intentions. You imagine silence as absence. But the night is not empty. The night is full of information. The First Rule of Night The first rule of night is this: Nothing is ever truly alone. When the sun leaves, the land exhales. The small creatures come out first—fast ones, quiet ones, the ones that believe speed is the same as safety. Then come the watchers. Then the things that pretend they are neither prey nor predator. I know all of them. I know which sounds mean movement and which mean warning. I know the difference between wind moving leaves and feet testing ground. I know when the air tightens just before something crosses into space it does not own. You hear noise. I hear grammar. Cold Is Not an Enemy You think cold is cruel. Cold is honest. Cold strips away weakness. Cold teaches you to position yourself correctly, to choose shelter instead of assuming it will be given. My fur is thick. My body is compact. When I tuck my paws beneath myself and curve my spine just right, I become a small, efficient furnace. I know where the heat hides. Behind structures. Against engines that remember motion. Near walls that block wind without trapping scent. Sometimes I sleep lightly. Sometimes I do not sleep at all. Rest does not always require unconsciousness. Heat Is Worse Than Cold Heat is impatient. Heat makes creatures sloppy. It dulls the senses. It convinces you that lying still is enough, even when it isn’t. On hot days, I disappear into shade you didn’t know existed. I move only when the sun demands it. I drink when my body tells me—not when the clock suggests I should. You look for me and cannot find me. This alarms you. It should not. If you cannot see me, it means I am doing my job correctly. The Long Pauses on Camera Sometimes, on the security camera, you see me sitting. Not moving. Not blinking. Just sitting. You think, Is he okay? I am better than okay. I am listening. There are moments when the land speaks softly, and if you move too soon, you miss the sentence. I wait through entire paragraphs of silence to hear one word that matters. Patience is not laziness. Patience is a weapon. The Boundaries Every territory has edges. Not fences—those are human ideas. I mean real boundaries. Where scent fades. Where confidence changes. Where footsteps hesitate. I walk these lines regularly, refreshing what needs refreshing, adjusting where the world has shifted. Sometimes something challenges a boundary. Most of the time, it decides not to. You never know this happens. That is the point. The Sounds That Wake Me There are sounds that mean nothing. There are sounds that mean food. There are sounds that mean weather. And then there are sounds that wake every part of me at once. A scrape where there should be none. A rhythm that doesn’t belong. A pause in the background noise that is too sudden to be natural. When that happens, my body moves before thought arrives. You never see this part on camera. I make sure of that. Why I Speak to You. You think it’s charming that I talk. You think it’s unusual. It is neither. Speech is a tool. You respond to it faster than posture or gaze or silence. I learned the sounds that open doors, produce food, and summon attention. “Out” is efficient. “Mama” is strategic. When I speak, I am not asking. I am informing. Why I Only Sleep Inside Sometimes. Sleep is vulnerability. Inside sleep is shared vulnerability. I do it rarely because it means trusting that the perimeter will hold without me. When I sleep by the fireplace, I am allowing myself to believe—just for a while—that everything is exactly where it should be. This is not weakness. This is confidence. You and the Watching You think watching me exhausts you. Imagine being me. Every step is awareness. Every pause is calculation. Every choice matters. And yet— I choose this. I choose the night. I choose the cold. I choose the watch. And I choose to come back. Every time. End of Chapter Two Views: 1
Category: Cars
I AM BOSTON: CHAPTER 1; Keeper of the Perimeter, Guardian of the Machines, Black Cat of the Firelight
Keeper of the Perimeter, Guardian of the Machines, Black Cat of the Firelight I am Boston. Before we go any further, you should understand something important: I am not your cat. I am a cat who has chosen you as staff. This is not arrogance. It is accuracy. I am black as midnight asphalt after rain, with green eyes sharp enough to cut through darkness, heat shimmer, snow glare, and the foolish assumptions of humans who think comfort is measured in temperature rather than purpose. My name is Boston, and I live outside. Yes, outside. All the time. Day. Night. Heat. Cold. Wind. Silence. Noise. Inside is for eating, reporting in, warming briefly by fire, and occasionally sleeping when I decide the universe has earned the privilege of my presence. You worry about this. I know you do. I hear it in your voice, in the way you say my name with concern stretched thin around the edges. I see it in the way you watch the security cameras, following my black shape as it moves from shadow to shadow like a thought that refuses to settle. Watching me wears you out. Good. That means you are paying attention. Why I Stay Outside You think it’s about temperature. You think, It’s too hot, or It’s too cold, or Surely he must want to be inside. You are wrong. Outside is not a place. Outside is responsibility. Outside is where things happen. Inside is predictable. Inside smells like human routines and furniture that never moves. Inside has rules about where to sit, where not to scratch, and how long a creature may stare into fire before it becomes “concerning.” Outside has variables. Outside has information. Outside is mine. When the sun burns the ground hot enough to cook foolish bare paws, I find shade. When the cold comes creeping under my fur like a question with teeth, I answer it by moving, by choosing position, by understanding wind and structure the way only something that belongs to the land can. You see discomfort. I see conditions. The Doors (A Necessary Clarification) Let us discuss doors. There are two kinds of doors in this world: Correct doors Incorrect doors The front door is incorrect. It smells wrong. It opens to the wrong angles. It is exposed. It feels watched. Things come in through it that do not belong. Things leave through it that should have stayed. The back door is honest. The back door understands me. I will sit at the back door and announce myself clearly, in words you understand, because I am not some mute woodland cryptid incapable of communication. “Out.” “I want out.” “Mom.” “Mama.” Yes, I say them clearly. No, it is not an accident. I have vocabulary because I choose efficiency. If humans insist on being verbal creatures, then I will meet them halfway. I could meow. But why be vague when clarity gets doors opened faster? On Fireplaces and Temporary Truces Despite everything I have said, there is one place inside that matters. The fireplace. When I come in to sleep, it is not surrender. It is a truce. Fire is an old thing. Older than houses. Older than furniture. Fire understands territory. Fire respects silence. I lie in front of it, black fur absorbing warmth, green eyes half-lidded, listening to the quiet crackle and thinking thoughts that would concern you if you could hear them. Not violent thoughts. Strategic ones. The fireplace is where I remember that I am not just a guardian, but also a creature who enjoys comfort when it is earned. I do not sleep long. I never do. Sleep is shallow. One ear always tuned for the sound of something out of place. The Cars and the Truck (My Machines) You believe the cars belong to you. This is understandable but incorrect. They are mine. I guard them by lying on them. This is not laziness. This is dominance layered with protection. When I stretch across a hood or curl atop the truck, I am leaving my signature. My warmth sinks into the metal. My scent tells every passing thing—animal, human, spirit, or idea—that these machines are claimed. Also, from this vantage point, I can see. Movement across the property changes when you elevate yourself. Lines become clear. Paths reveal themselves. I can tell when something has crossed where it should not have crossed, even if nothing visible remains. You worry about scratches. I worry about intrusions. We all have priorities. Wandering (Which Is Not Wandering) You call it wandering. I call it inspection. Every circuit of the property is deliberate. I know the land the way you know your own hands. I know where the ground dips slightly after rain, where scents linger longer in the shade, where night creatures pretend they aren’t watching. I stop. I listen. I sit perfectly still—not because I am tired, but because motion is information and stillness is power. On the security camera, this must look exhausting. To me, it is peace. The Cameras (Yes, I Know) Do you think I don’t know about the cameras? Please. I have stared directly into them. I have watched the faint glow. I have adjusted my route when I felt observed too closely. I am aware that you watch me. I feel it like a thread pulling softly at the back of my awareness. Sometimes I pause longer than necessary, just to see if you are still there. You always are. That is… acceptable. What I Think About When I’m Alone I think about patterns. I think about how long it takes the sun to shift shadows across the fence line. I think about which birds are foolish and which are clever. I think about how the wind changes its voice before weather arrives. Sometimes I think about you. Not sentimentally. Practically. You are part of the territory. A constant. A reliable source of food, warmth, and conversation when I feel like testing new words. I… Continue reading I AM BOSTON: CHAPTER 1; Keeper of the Perimeter, Guardian of the Machines, Black Cat of the Firelight
🧰 Snap-On vs. Harbor Freight: The Real-World Tool Buyer’s Dilemma
🧰 Compare Snap-On tool truck prices vs. Harbor Freight’s affordable “buy two” strategy. Learn which tools give you better value, faster warranty service, and less downtime on the job. Snap-On tools, Harbor Freight, tool truck prices, lifetime warranty, mechanic tools, Icon tools, tool comparison, Snap-On vs Harbor Freight 🛻 Tool Truck Tradition: Snap-On as the Example Snap-On, Matco, Mac, and Cornwell trucks have been fixtures in shops for decades. They bring professional-grade tools directly to your workplace—but that convenience comes with a hefty price tag. 🔩 Pros of Tool Truck Brands Top-tier quality: Premium steel, smooth finishes, tight tolerances. Weekly service: The truck comes to your bay—no trip to the store. Prestige: Owning Snap-On tools is a badge of professionalism. Financing available: Buy now, pay weekly (but beware of interest). ⚠️ Cons of Tool Truck Brands High cost: A single ratchet may run $100–150. Warranty wait: If a tool breaks, you wait for the truck’s next visit. Financing pitfalls: Interest and weekly payments can add up fast. 🧰 Harbor Freight: The Two-for-One Strategy Harbor Freight’s Icon, Quinn, and Pittsburgh Pro tools have stepped up in quality—many rivaling mid-tier professional tools at a fraction of the price. The smart mechanic’s move: buy two of every tool. Use one daily, keep the second as backup. When one breaks, grab the spare and replace the broken one immediately under Harbor Freight’s lifetime warranty—NO DOWNTIME, no waiting for a truck. ✅ Pros of the Harbor Freight Double-Up Method Massive savings: Even with two sets, costs are under half of Snap-On’s. Instant replacement: Walk in, swap it out, get back to work. Debt-free: Pay cash—no weekly payments or interest. Always ready: You’ll never be without a tool mid-job. ⚙️ Cons of the Harbor Freight Method Quality variation: Lower lines (like Pittsburgh) may not match Icon’s durability. Less polish: Slightly rougher machining and tolerances. No truck service: You lose that rolling convenience and community. 💵 Price Comparison Chart Tool Type Snap-On Price Harbor Freight (Icon) Buy Two (Backup Plan) Savings 3/8” Drive Ratchet $120 $30 $60 $60 saved 10mm Socket $25 $5 $10 $15 saved Wrench Set (Metric 10–19mm) $250 $60 $120 $130 saved Total for Basic Set $395 $95 $190 $205 saved Even doubling up Harbor Freight’s best line, you still save more than 50%—and always have a working backup. ⚖️ Warranty Turnaround Comparison Factor Snap-On Harbor Freight Claim Process Wait for tool truck In-store replacement Turnaround Time 3–7 days 5–10 minutes (This can be done during off time) Proof Needed Sometimes Rarely Availability Truck visits weekly 7 days a week 🚗 Real-World Verdict If you’re a career mechanic who depends on precision tools daily, Snap-On still shines for its flawless balance, comfort, and craftsmanship—especially for specialty tools and torque instruments. But for most techs, DIYers, and startup shops, Harbor Freight’s double-set method wins on cost, convenience, and uptime. 💬 Bottom Line ” Snap-On tools make you look professional. Harbor Freight tools keep you working professional. Views: 1
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT: TORNADO SAFETY
[adrotate group=”1″] What Are Tornadoes? Tornadoes are powerful, rapidly rotating columns of air that extend from thunderstorms to the ground. They can cause immense damage, uprooting trees, demolishing buildings, and hurling debris at high speeds. Here’s what you need to know to stay safe during tornado season: Stay Informed: Tornado Watch: Be prepared! Tornadoes are possible in your area. Stay alert and monitor local weather updates. Tornado Warning: Take action! A tornado is imminent. Seek shelter immediately. Find Shelter: Identify safe locations in advance: Basements: Ideal for protection. Interior Rooms: Choose a small, windowless room on the lowest floor. Avoid Mobile Homes: They are not safe during tornadoes. Practice tornado drills with your household. Stay Connected: Sign up for local emergency alerts. Monitor weather updates and news. Keep a backup battery or charger for your cell phone. Emergency Supplies: Gather essential items: Go-Kit: At least 3 days of supplies (food, water, medications). Stay-at-Home Kit: At least 2 weeks of supplies. Include batteries, chargers, and a battery-powered radio. During a Tornado: Seek Shelter Immediately: Move to your designated safe room. Cover yourself with blankets or mattresses to protect against debris. Bring head protection and sturdy shoes. Avoid Windows and Doors: Flying debris poses the greatest risk. Stay Informed: Listen to emergency alerts and weather updates. Turn up your TV or radio to hear warnings. Don’t Open Windows: Contrary to old beliefs, it won’t prevent damage. Check on Neighbors: After the tornado passes, ensure everyone is safe. Tornado Direction: Most tornadoes in the Northern Hemisphere spin counterclockwise. While they often move from southwest to northeast, there’s no absolute rule. Wind conditions influence their path. Remember, tornadoes can strike unexpectedly, so be prepared and take immediate action when warnings are issued. Stay safe and protect yourself and your loved ones! 🌪️🏠 🚗 For more information, visit the Red Cross Tornado Safety Tips and Ready.gov Tornadoes [adrotate group=”1″] Views: 126
THE CONS of TRAFFIC CIRCLES
‘[adrotate group=”1″] Traffic circles, also known as roundabouts or rotaries, are circular intersections that are designed to reduce crashes, injuries, and congestion by eliminating traffic lights and allowing vehicles to flow continuously in one direction. However, traffic circles are not without their drawbacks. In this post, we will explore some of the cons of traffic circles and why they are not always the best solution for traffic management. Confusion and Fear One of the main disadvantages of traffic circles is that they can cause confusion and fear among drivers, especially those who are unfamiliar with them or encounter them infrequently. Traffic circles ,than conventional intersections, such as yielding to the traffic already in the circle, choosing the correct lane, and exiting at the right time. These rules can vary depending on the size, design, and location of the traffic circle, adding to the complexity and uncertainty. Some drivers may not know how to navigate a traffic circle properly, leading to mistakes, hesitation, or aggression. Other drivers may avoid traffic circles altogether, preferring to take longer or less convenient routes. Space and Cost Another disadvantage of traffic circles is that they can take up more space and cost more money than conventional intersections. Traffic circles typically require a larger footprint than traffic lights, which can be a problem in urban areas where space is limited or valuable. Traffic circles may also require additional land acquisition, road widening, or relocation of utilities, which can increase the cost and complexity of the project. Moreover, traffic circles may not be compatible with existing road geometry, traffic patterns, or environmental conditions, requiring additional modifications or adaptations. Safety and Efficiency A third disadvantage of traffic circles is that they may not always improve safety and efficiency as intended. While traffic circles can reduce the severity and frequency of crashes by eliminating right-angle and head-on collisions, they can also increase the risk of rear-end and sideswipe collisions by forcing drivers to merge, change lanes, and exit at high speeds. Furthermore, traffic circles may not be able to handle large volumes of traffic or accommodate large vehicles, such as buses, trucks, or emergency vehicles, resulting in congestion*, delays, or conflicts. Additionally, traffic circles may pose challenges for pedestrians, bicyclists, and visually impaired people, who may have difficulty crossing the road or finding their way around the circle. *I can attest to not handling large volumes of traffic. An intersection I frequently used, (with a stop sign would mean a short stop and go). With the roundabout it took over a half hour to cross that intersection. I was going North, the East-West traffic was so congested because of roundabouts further down the road causing a steady flow of people going East and West to and from work. There was traffic backed up as far as the eye could see. Now you go back to the other roundabouts and you can imagine the North-South traffic was backed up at each one. As if the backup wasn’t bad enough imagine the problems caused by the people backed up. Either trying to cross the street or entering the street we were on, and at the other roundabout traffic circles. Just accidents, ROAD RAGE, etc. I came to the conclusion the real gains were made by the TOW TRUCK operators. I am sure they must have a party everytime a new roundabout is built. (Not really a party, BUT knowing their profits will rise). Conclusion Traffic circles are not a one-size-fits-all solution for traffic management. They have their pros and cons, and their effectiveness depends on various factors, such as the design, location, and context of the traffic circle. Therefore, traffic engineers and planners should carefully evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of traffic circles before implementing them, and consider alternative or complementary measures, such as traffic signals, signs, markings, or education, to enhance the safety and efficiency of traffic circles. ‘[adrotate group=”1″] Views: 135
Improper Police Chase Procedure
Just a couple of weeks ago I posted a story about the PROPER CHASE PROCEDURE. In that post I told of how a police officer ceased his HOT PURSUIT, and called ahead to make the stop. TODAY, I am relaying a story just a couple of counties away from that pursuit. Only this time the police did not radio ahead. They continued the chase. The outcome of that chase was not an ideal one. The officers involved deemed it more important to make a traffic stop, than to consider the consequences. Instead of asking for help from fellow officers, they pursued the purported offender, without regard for the safety of John Q. Public. This resulted in the death of two innocent females, unaware of the fate the police were driving their way. The pursued vehicle, crashed into the ladies. Both were KILLED. Yes killed may sound harsh but, that is what it is. They died the same as if someone had shot them. The SAME DEAD. Now you may say the driver of the pursued vehicle is guilty of Vehicular Homicide, (or whatever the proper legal term is), as a fact. Had he or she, not chose to run, the ladies would still be alive. BUT, we know that in this case there was an ABETTOR. THE POLICE. Had they not chosen to pursue, the ladies would have been alive. Most likely the pursued would have slowed and not crashed into them. They could have been stopped by use of the technology available now. Chances are once they were away from the first attempted stop.thinking they had not broken any laws in that area, could have been stopped by any means, be it a controlled traffic jam, or a seatbelt checkpoint, which we have in this state. By continuing the chase, these officers are just as guilty, (in my mind), as the actual driver who collided with the ladies. What will happen to them. NOT A THING! After all they ARE the POLICE, doing their job. BUT WAIT, isn’t it their JOB to SERVE AND PROTECT? Does Serving and Protecting, include being a party to the death of innocent bystanders? As I see it, the police should face the same penalties. Both parties had a hand in the deaths. The Officer or Officers involved made an informed and conscious decision to put the public in danger by pursuing this vehicle. There is a time when one must use some common sense. A question we all must ask ourselves. ARE, police above the law. It would seem that way in so many ways. (Which I will not go into here). Not all Cops are included. But where I live We have had cops not so inclined to behave ethically. The new Police Chief, claims to be trying to correct this. I must admit I have seen some progress that way. That Is How I See It. Views: 100
Unmarked Police Cars
Just a short post I just watched a video on YAHOO.com. I found extremely informative, and thought provoking. The video was of a man pulling over a Washington state police officer. Citing a State law which prohibits the use of UNMARKED POLICE VEHICLES being used as patrol cars. Stating that unmarked cars are usable in undercover investigations. The point that was brought up is…A citizen cannot know if he is being pulled over by an authorized police officer, or a stalker, or a serial killer. (to go from one comparison point to another). In the state i live in we have had numerous incidences, ( specially unescorted women), being pulled over by a predator, or cop want to be, by cars MARKED as police cars. Now you throw in the UNMARKED car issue. So how do you know if you should pull over. Just because a car has the lights, which can be bought by it seems anyone. You have seen them in movies, car shows,etc., doesn’t mean there is a rel reason, or a real cop behind the wheel. Yet if you don’t stop then you are accused of resisting a police officer. Pull over in a well lit public spot? I have been on roads where I might travel 30-40 miles before I find a spot like this. You know by this time if the cop is real he is going to have an army of fellow officers after me. I will be charged with fleeing law enforcement. We know we do have officers, though few in the overall number of police officers, who would fall in this category of predatory behavior. I do recall the times when a Town Clown, (town cop), would camp outside someones home and wait for them to leave so they could stop them for loud muffler violations. I know of a man who did drink too much, BUT city cops would wait about a block from the bar he visited and wait for him to leave. I knew they were waiting and told him to stay his regular time, but only drink Coke. He did. They pulled him over almost as soon as he pulled out of his parking spot. Ha! Ha! Joke was on them. Another time a friend of mine was 5 minutes from his house when pulled over. They gave him a breath test, and he passed it. They held him there for 20 minutes, by then the alcohol had apparently entered his blood stream and he failed. Off to jail. in our state we had a ,I think state police officer, who was convicted of murder 2 times. (Same Murder). Yet he was granted a 3rd trial, with the stipulation that the convicting evidence in the first 2 rials could not be used. Like I said these are hopefully few and far between. In closing I would like to go record as being a proponent for discontinuing use of unmarked patrol cars for police use. This I do in the name of Citizen Safety. That Is How I See It. Below is a link to the video. Whether it will still be up when you check it… I don’t know. I know they usually only have these things up for a short period of time. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/trending-now/citizen-pulls-over-police-officer-193834583.html Views: 112
105 Percent Rule Confusing
How many of you out there found the INDY Car 105% rule confusing? Am I the only one? We were all taught in grade school that 100% is all there is. You can have a glass of milk that is anywhere from 1% to 99% full and still have room for more. But once it reaches 100% full there is no more you can add. I eat 100% of a raspberry pie, guess what you aren’t getting any. There is none left. Because the 105% mostly applies to the slower cars in the race, one would have to assume the slowest cars on the track would have to run 105%, of the lead car. Example say the leader has a lap speed of 220 mph. This would mean the slowest car, in order to maintain the 105% rule would have to be traveling a speed of 231 mph. (220=100%) (22o x .05 [ 5%] = 231.) That would be 5% faster than the leader. WAIT A MINUTE !!!! If the slowest car is running 11 mph faster than the leader then the leader can not be leading, at least not for long. Now I realize we aren’t all engineers, Thus the 105% rule was not meant to be understood by us mere mortals. Now, let me put it this way. And I think this really makes more sense, as the apparent reason behind the rule is to keep the slower cars in a safer operating range with the average race speed. So would it not make more sense to say…call it a 95% RULE. Again let us use the 220 mph model as before. 220 x .95 (95%) = 209. An 11 mph difference. Slower still but you must admit more obtainable for the LOTUS than 231 mph. Like I have said before I am no mathematician. But 105% can’t make sense in any ones mind when it comes to racing speed (except an engineer). Especially when you are talking of slower cars. But a 95% rule holds water. Is there anyone out there who can explain a car going 105% faster that the fastest car (let alone the average speed) can be the slowest car. I can see the government taxing us 105% by the time all taxes are applied to my dollar. Perhaps this is how INDY Racing came up with that percentage. That Is How I See It Views: 189
Parents Must Pay For Bus Ride To School
Franklin Township in central Indiana sold school buses to an independent firm for $1. Now parents of the children in this district have a choice to make. Take them to school, and pick them up. (Which would have been impossible for me as a working single parent). Let them walk in the dark of the morning. Dark because Supreme Ruler Mitch Daniels, deemed Indiana, a state which lines up in the CENTRAL time zone, observe ATLANTIC time (AKA Eastern DAYLIGHT SAVINGS time). Which puts Indiana residents 2 hours ahead of the sun. Thus children walking in the dark to school. Or, PAY about $475.oo a year for the first student in the family, with a discount for other children of the family. From what I read a family of 2 students will pay $900.oo So, the way I figure it the rest of the families students ride for $425.oo each. That means a family who is either living on unemployment, or welfare, or working and earning the minimum wage will really have little choice, but to make them walk, and risk being kidnapped. Hit by a car or truck or/and harmed in some way. Heck it would be a drain on any family. By the time you clothe, and pay at least a couple of dollars for school lunches, extra curricular fees, and book rentals. Plus the BUS fee of approximately $50.oo, per sport, per student participant imposed on them. This all started when the Franklin Township school board decided they wanted more money than was available and wanted to raise taxes. The referendum was voted down. So, it seems to me their reaction, was an immature…We’ll make you pay one way or the other! Other schools, faced the same cost cutting measures, and most have met the cuts needed without any repercussions. The most penalties, school districts have made is a modest bus fee for sports, and extra curricular activities. But in some areas the business people have donated the money to cover those fees. A pride in their communities. Some schools/sports are putting on charity events to cover these costs. These are public schools using tax payer money. What effect will this have on the community? Will people move away? Will business close due to lack of customers, or workforce. With a drop in enrollment also comes a drop in state funds. The formula is so convoluted, I’m surprised a lawyer can figure it out. But the way it seems to me, a smaller school get less money from the state than a larger school. (Which seems a little unfair). Each day or part thereof missed by a student equals a deduction in the amount received by that school. I’ve rambled on too long. What it appears we have here is a very greedy school system which has little empathy with the well being of the community children and a lust for more money. It would serve them right if everyone moved out of their district, (which I know they either can’t or won’t). I believe it is time for the voters, community leaders, and parents, take back the school system. It seems apparent to me the school board has no concern about their students. Will the harm the children face walking to school in the dark. Or the hardship put on families affect the members. Probably not. The only thing that will affect them is a loss of MONIES. Could this happen to your children? Is your community next? That Is How I See It. have been Views: 143
Accident 45 Years Ago Adds To 2011 Death Toll
This is one for the books. Perhaps a legal question. Or just an example of how our politicians use statistics, and the like. According to what I read. Forty Five years ago a woman in Northern Indiana was injured in an automobile accident. Extremely injured, she became paralyzed. Now 45 years later she died. Her death went into the records as an automobile accident death for the year 2011. I found this to be puzzling. She has lived 45 years after the accident. But according to the records she died of injuries received in the accident 45 years ago. Of course I realize she was injured, and quite badly. BUT. What I don’t understand is what kind of injury from an automobile accident can kill you 45 years later. And why this would go on the record as a 2011 automobile death. One would naturally think if you live 45 years after an accident, there must have been another cause for death. Will the auto insurance pay a death benefit after 45 years. Will this have to go to court. If the other driver was responsible, will he now face charges of vehicular homicide, or something. There just seems to be so many ramifications of this case. Any one have an answer for me? Doesn’t make sense to me. That Is How I See It. have been became Views: 356
