The Complete History of the Dodgers: From Brooklyn to Los Angeles Few franchises in Major League Baseball have a history as complicated, influential, and successful as the Dodgers. The franchise began in Brooklyn in the 1880s, became known by a remarkable collection of nicknames, broke baseball’s color barrier with Jackie Robinson, won its first World Series in Brooklyn in 1955, moved to Los Angeles in 1958, and eventually became one of baseball’s most valuable and successful organizations. The Dodgers have played in two of America’s greatest baseball cities, occupied some of the most famous ballparks in baseball history, produced generations of Hall of Famers and Rookie of the Year winners, and occasionally traded away players who later became stars elsewhere. As of the 2026 season, the Brooklyn/Los Angeles Dodgers franchise has won nine World Series championships and 27 National League pennants. The Beginning: Brooklyn Baseball The organization that eventually became the Dodgers dates to 1883, when Brooklyn entered the American Association. The club was initially known as the Brooklyn Grays. Over the years, the franchise used numerous names: Brooklyn Grays Brooklyn Atlantics Brooklyn Bridegrooms Brooklyn Grooms Brooklyn Superbas Brooklyn Trolley Dodgers Brooklyn Dodgers The nickname “Dodgers” eventually became permanent. The famous story behind the name is connected with Brooklyn’s trolley system. When the team played at Eastern Park in the 1890s, fans had to dodge trolley cars on their way to the ballpark. The phrase “Trolley Dodgers” became associated with Brooklyn baseball and was eventually shortened to Dodgers. Every Major Dodgers Home Ballpark The Dodgers have an unusually long ballpark history because of their Brooklyn roots. 1. Washington Park I — Brooklyn 1884–1890 Washington Park Washington Park I — Brooklynwas the original major professional home of the Brooklyn club after it joined the American Association. It was located in the Park Slope section of Brooklyn. 2. Ridgewood Park — Queens 1886–1889 — occasional Sunday home games The Dodgers also played Sunday games at Ridgewood Park in Queens during their early years. This was not their principal home field, but it was used for home games. 3. Eastern Park — Brooklyn 1891–1897 Eastern Park became an important part of Dodgers history because it is closely associated with the origin of the Trolley Dodgers nickname. The park was in East New York, Brooklyn, and could accommodate roughly 18,000 spectators in its larger configuration. 4. Washington Park II — Brooklyn 1898–1912 The Dodgers returned to Washington Park, but this was a different ballpark from the original Washington Park. The club had outgrown its earlier facilities, and crowds eventually overwhelmed the park. 5. Ebbets Field — Brooklyn 1913–1957 Ebbets Field is arguably the most beloved home in Dodgers history. Opened in 1913, it became the home of generations of Brooklyn stars, including: Jackie Robinson, Roy Campanella, Pee Wee Reese, Duke Snider, Gil Hodges, Don Newcombe, Sandy Koufax It was also the site of the Dodgers’ historic 1955 World Series championship, Brooklyn’s first and only World Series title. The Dodgers played their final game at Ebbets Field on September 24, 1957. The ballpark was demolished in 1960. 6. Roosevelt Stadium — Jersey City, New Jersey 1956–1957 — occasional home games The Dodgers played a small number of home games at Roosevelt Stadium in Jersey City while still officially representing Brooklyn. They played seven home games there in 1956 and seven in 1957 according to the Dodgers’ official ballpark history. 7. Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum — Los Angeles 1958–1961 When Walter O’Malley moved the Dodgers from Brooklyn to Los Angeles, the club did not immediately have its own baseball stadium. The temporary solution was the enormous Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. The Coliseum could seat more than 90,000 people, but its unusual dimensions created one of the strangest home fields in baseball history. The left-field line was only about 250 feet, requiring a huge protective screen. The Dodgers played their first Los Angeles home game there on April 18, 1958. 8. Dodger Stadium — Los Angeles 1962–present Dodger Stadium opened on April 10, 1962. Walter O’Malley privately financed and built the stadium, which became one of the most recognizable ballparks in baseball. More than six decades later, Dodger Stadium remains the Dodgers’ home. The Owners of the Dodgers The ownership history is almost as complicated as the playing history. Because ownership frequently involved partnerships and minority shareholders, it is more accurate to identify the principal ownership groups and controlling owners rather than pretend every small shareholder was the sole owner. 1880s–1890s: The Early Owners Among the early owners and partners were: Charles H. Byrne, Joseph Doyle, Ferdinand A. Abell, Charles H. Ebbets, George Chauncey, Harry Von der Horst, Ned Hanlon Charles Byrne was one of the key founders of the Brooklyn club. Charles Ebbets eventually became the dominant figure and helped establish the franchise as a permanent Brooklyn institution. Charles H. Ebbets 1902–1925 — principal owner Ebbets eventually obtained control of the franchise and became one of the most important owners in early baseball. His greatest physical legacy was Ebbets Field, which opened in 1913. The McKeever and Ebbets Families Following the deaths of Charles Ebbets and Edward McKeever, ownership became divided among their heirs, the McKeever interests and other shareholders. The organization remained a complicated partnership rather than simply belonging to one person. Walter O’Malley Changes Everything Walter F. O’Malley 1944–1979 Walter O’Malley purchased an interest in the Dodgers in 1944. By 1950, he had become the controlling owner. O’Malley became one of the most influential owners in baseball history. He was determined to build a winning organization and eventually concluded that Brooklyn could not provide the modern stadium and parking facilities he wanted. The Dodgers won their first World Series championship under O’Malley in 1955. Then came the controversial decision that changed baseball forever. The Move to Los Angeles After the 1957 season, O’Malley moved the Dodgers from Brooklyn to Los Angeles. The move was enormously controversial in Brooklyn, where the Dodgers were more than a baseball team. They were part of the identity… Continue reading The Complete History of the Dodgers
Tag: Pennsylvania
Parkland High School Shooting Thoughts
While putting together my thoughts on the recent tragedy in Florida. I had many things flash through this feeble mind. We had the shock of another terrible loss of young lives. We had the “STUDENT ACTOR”. We had the Scripted Interviews. We had the usual MEDIA SPIN. We had the Anti Gunners. We had the Pro-Gunners. We had the Sheriff’s men who failed to enter the school. So let us look at these things. First the Shooter. Had he not lost his parents at such a tender age, would he not have acted the way he did. It appears that his adoptive family, noticed he was troubled. According to reports the local constabulary, even the FBI, had concerns about the mental/emotional stability of Nineteen (19) year old Nikolas Cruz, EVEN the school personnel had concerns. They expelled him. I have not read or heard anything where these people tried to get him help. Had they tried to get him help, would it have possibly detoured this terrible event. Probably, maybe not. We don’t know. BUT, it would have been worth a try. Should he have had guns. Given his background reports we have seen; NO! BUT, there is always a but; I believe this to be where the LAW should have impounded his guns, until further investigation, and psychic evaluation was attained. BUT, WAIT ! He did have grenades. Where did these come from? I am sure they are harder to get than guns. Aren’t they? Seems they should be. Now the student and teacher population of this School. It is always a bad sign for our future when innocent young people needlessly lose their lives. Seventeen, 17, lives. I would not want my children exposed to this. Nor to the pain of those who were at the school or worse witnessed the unfortunate incident. I know of no Teacher who leaves for school thinking I may be killed at work today. Who knows what emotional and/or mental damage may have been done. We all know the MEDIA, has a penchant to SLANT the news the way they want it. How many times have you watched political events, or anything, only to have the NEWS MEDIA, say “Now let US tell you what you really heard”. ? I remember learning in grade school, then having my newspaper editor reinforce. A reporter tells WHO, is in the story. WHAT, is the story. WHEN, the event occurred. WHY, did the event occur. The WHY, becomes the gray area. You have heard of sport team announcers getting fired because they said something the OWNER found to be derogatory to the team. Players get fined, for the same thing. It most probably is TRUE. BUT, are contrary to what the BOSS wants. The same is true with reporters, They may disagree with management, BUT, (see here it is again; I wonder how many times I will use it today), THEIR JOB maybe on the line. Some may simply state their opinions, (NOT FACTS), In other words they EDITORIALIZE. NOTE: Editorialize is what I do. After all this BLOG is for MY OPINIONS. I share them with you as MY opinions. Not hardcore news. (See the difference) Is the media above scripting interviews. NO happens quite often. Are the anti-gunners above hiring actors to further their propaganda. SURE ARE. How about the Pro-gunners. Could be. Probably do. But I prefer to think They would be ABOVE taking advantage of such an event as this. One thing ANTI-GUNNERS are quick to point out is “Law enforcement is only a call away”. In this case they were just OUTSIDE the door. THEY WERE A LOT OF HELP. Had teachers been able to have guns….Would that have altered the outcome? Hard to tell. I am not sure I would be able to pull the trigger. I think I would be more inclined to pull that trigger to protect someone else (KIDS) than I would be to protect myself. BUT, I am sure if it was him or me, I would choose ME. What I am saying is; if it were just me and him, I would most likely not go hunt him. BUT, if he came hunting for me. DEFINITELY ME. Back to the Law Enforcement Officers. YOU CANNOT COUNT ON THEM. My own experience. 1. I had a motorcycle stolen off my front porch. I called the police. I was told; “ASK YOUR NEIGHBORS IF THEY SAW ANYTHING”. ” COME TO THE STATION AND FILL OUT A REPORT”. 2. My High School son was threatened that he would be shot when he walked out of the school, (a disagreement about a girl), I called the cops. I was told, “Just one of those teenage things. You probably should pick him up and take him home after school”. 3. I had my Mustang convertible top slashed, the dash destroyed. My truck window smashed and the stereos stolen from both. Witnesses knew who did it. The Cops knocked on the culprits door, and said, “Did you steal those radios’? He said, “No”. The cops said okay. That was all there was to it. 4. While watching a friends property while he was away. One of his relatives called said he had received a threat of vandalism to the property at some time soon. I called our local County Mounties. “It will be some time before we can get there”, they said. It took me about a half hour to get there. No damage yet. One (1) hour passed. No County Mounties. After waiting another half hour, I called again. “We haven’t dispatched anyone to that location yet” Yeah. Right. The Law is only a few minutes away. HA,HA. The Right to Bear Arms is a constitutional right. A Right that state shall not be infringed upon. That means NO ONE can stop you from legally owning or carrying a gun. There have been exceptions made. Felons, people with a misdemeanor of domestic battery, mental disorders, or if so adjudicated by a judge. Driving is… Continue reading Parkland High School Shooting Thoughts
GUN CONTROL: IS IT NEEDED? PART 3
Welcome back. I have taken a little longer on this part. I really wanted to know more about how gun control has worked for the countries, (and our own states with gun control). This is what I found out. It appears that the first steps taken by dictators is to seize full control is to: Suppress the basic freedoms. RELIGION, SPEECH, and RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. We have already experienced attempt at all of these. The Supreme Court has taken it upon itself to MAKE/ALTER, (however you want to put it), the intent of our CONSTITUTION. Their job is to interpret not make up their own laws. An example of this would be if I were talking to a person from say Japan. I say, “Hello, it is nice to meet you”. The interpreter tells this person from Japan “Hello, why don’t you go back to Japan.” So you can see how the erosion of our basic rights IS happening. I remember Soviet Premier Kruschev saying, “We will bury you”. He gave no time line. Nor method of carrying this threat out. Back to the Supreme Court Justices. RE; the FREEDOM OF RELIGION. The intent of this RIGHT was very simple. The government shall not dictate any one religion. Example would be Pennsylvania founded by Quakers. Pennsylvania is not to make it a condition of Pennsylvania you must be Quaker to reside there. Or Utah to require you to be Mormon to live there. But as you have seen they have taken the whole concept and mis-construed it to say I don’t have the right to openly practice my faith in a government facility. They did this which changed one word of the this Amendment. They effectively changed “…FREEDOM OF RELIGION, to read. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION. See how one word can change the whole intent. No they didn’t physically change the word, just the way they interpret it. New York and especially New York City, Illinois (with Chicago). Washington D.C. and all the states with strict “gun control laws”, have a higher crime rate than states with laxer gun control laws. The United Kingdom confiscated all guns, (from law abiding citizens, according to the reports I have heard), has seen a 40% rise in gun related crimes. One English police officer said. “…Our job is harder. Only the criminals have guns… and they are more willing to use them.” One example I have heard of is about a farmer named Tony Martin. The story goes like this. Two men, actually a man and a teenager, broke into his rural home. Fred Barras, a 16 year old criminal had 29 convictions. Brendan Feraon, a 30 year old criminal, had 34 convictions. Fred Barras was fatally wounded. The farmer was sentenced to life in prison for murder. (The charge has been reduced to manslaughter, so he will eventually be set free). (Really? Life in prison for defending himself and his property?) Brendan Feraon, also was shot, and was sentenced to 3 years, but only served 18 months. Now Fearon is using taxpayer money to sue farmer, Martin for damages. Break into a home, then sue the victim for damages. It happens here. What is wrong with this picture? A criminal breaks into your home and then sues you for damage. Criminal definitely has an edge here. Authorities say Martin should not have used his gun, he should have yelled for help. He lived on a farm with no nearby neighbors. Who would have heard his cries for help at 2 in the morning. Those of us who live in towns and cities, Do you think someone in the house next door would hear you, or if they did; would they come to help you, or even call the police. Odds are the answer is NO! Australia, banned guns in 1996. The result there is as follows. ARMED ROBBERY, up 69%. ASSAULTS WITH GUNS, up 28%. GUN MURDERS, up 19%. HOME INVASIONS up 21%. So, instead of a decrease in crime we see an overall increase, of 137% The town of Kennesaw Georgia, actually passed a law requiring every household to have a gun. They immediately saw a drastic DROP in gun related crime. I don’t think I would like being told I had to own a gun, but I understand this law is not strictly enforced. But for the most part criminals will not risk being confronted with someone with a gun An unknown is just how much crime goes unreported. If there is no loss, or anything, (NO FOUL, NO HARM). No report. My conclusion regarding gun control is I AM AGAINST IT! Like (it seems is the majority of US citizens). I feel there should be some sort of control. But I really have no answer. The gun control I am against is the one which wants to take THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS OF LAW ABIDING CITIZENS away. The gun control to keep GUNS or any WEAPON out of the hands of CRIMINALS. That is the big problem. Law abiding citizens will obey laws. Criminals have no such regard for the Law. There will always be a black market. (A criminal element.) Criminals do not care where or how they get anything they want. For example, on the black market, a gun which normally sells for $600.oo may fetch upwards of $1500.oo. Where will the law breakers get that kind of money? Unlike you or me, and save up the money. They will steal it from the unarmed citizen. They will sell dope to your kids. Or they may even kill to get a gun. The police aren’t even exempt. They will still have guns. Simply walk up to one as a normal citizen, take a knife and stab or slit his throat. Now he has a gun and some ammunition. That is how dangerous the situation could get. One gun in the wrong hands, by this means, makes it easier to get more guns. A criminal will really have the… Continue reading GUN CONTROL: IS IT NEEDED? PART 3
Quaker State 400, Yawn
Quaker State 400. In Kentucky? Boy is my face red. One would think the Quaker State 400 would actually be run in Pennsylvania, (the Quaker State). It figures with NASCAR running things. Did everyone enjoy the “race”? Beside the Busch brothers. I found this race about as exciting as a snail race we had one day when I was a kid. On second thought the snail race was a much more contested event. And. Guess what. No one sat in their cars for hours, only to not see the race. I can’t say the traffic was NASCAR, or Burton Smith’s fault. But it does show a lack of preparation. By Both Parties. If first impressions are as important as most people claim. I’m afraid Kentucky’s Speedway is in a heap of hurt. Question: Did anyone check with the Kentucky Department of Transportation. They make traffic studies. Do I have an answer for the traffic problem. Not without the proper authorization to make studies. Maybe then I would find no problem. Maybe best move is to MOVE the track. But let’s be honest the location was not the only problem. The big problem was the racing. Reminds you of Formula 1. No passes on track for the lead. I like to see R-A-C-I-N-G, not just a parade of cars. I don’t blame the drivers I’m sure they were doing all they could to make a race of it. Racing just didn’t happen. As for me I would prefer to have another road course added instead of what we had at Sparta. Maybe they could change that speedway into a dirt track and invite NASCAR back next year. That is about the only thing I can see would bring the fans back to Sparta. Perhaps the ones who were stuck in traffic were the lucky ones. They probably saw more action, with people jockeying to improve their spot in traffic, than the fans at the track saw. That Is How I See It. find find find Views: 792