The Philadelphia Phillies: A Complete History

The Philadelphia Phillies: A Complete History of Baseball’s Oldest Continuous One-City Franchise The Philadelphia Phillies are one of the most remarkable franchises in professional sports. Founded in 1883, the Phillies are the oldest continuous, one-name, one-city franchise in professional sports. Their history includes pennants separated by decades of frustration, legendary players, colorful owners, unusual ballparks, devastating trades, heartbreaking losses and, finally, two World Series championships. The Phillies have played in Philadelphia for their entire existence. They have also experienced some of the longest periods of losing in major-league history. Yet generations of Philadelphia fans continued to support them, creating one of baseball’s most passionate fan bases. As of 2026, Philadelphia has won two World Series championships, in 1980 and 2008, and has appeared in the World Series eight times, most recently in 2022. The franchise’s official postseason record shows its World Series appearances and results from 1915 through 2022. The Beginning: 1883 The Phillies began in 1883 when the National League moved the franchise of the defunct Worcester Ruby Legs to Philadelphia. Two men were central to the beginning: Al Reach, a former professional baseball player and successful sporting-goods businessman John Rogers, a Philadelphia attorney Reach became the club’s first owner and helped give the team the name Phillies, a natural nickname referring to Philadelphia. The Phillies’ first game was played on May 1, 1883, at Recreation Park against the Providence Grays. Philadelphia lost 4-3. The franchise was sometimes called the Quakers during its early years, but Phillies became the official name in 1890. The organization has remained in Philadelphia ever since. Phillies Ownership Through the Years The Phillies experienced an extraordinary amount of ownership instability during their first six decades. MLB’s historical account notes that 10 different ownership groups controlled the franchise during its first 60 years. Al Reach and John Rogers — 1883-1903 Al Reach was the key founder and early owner. He was already a successful sporting-goods manufacturer and helped establish baseball’s business side in Philadelphia. Reach and Rogers eventually sold the franchise after the 1902 season. James Potter and the Pittsburgh Syndicate — 1903-1904 A syndicate connected with the Pittsburgh Pirates purchased the Phillies in 1903. James Potter became president. The arrangement lasted only about a year. William Locke and Others The next period was marked by several ownership changes. This instability became a recurring problem for the Phillies. Horace Fogel Horace Fogel became one of the team’s owners and later president. His tenure ended after he was banned from baseball for criticizing league officials and umpires. William Baker — 1913-1930 William Baker became one of the most influential early Phillies owners. He renamed Philadelphia Park Baker Bowl, which became the team’s home for many years. Baker was also the owner when Philadelphia finally reached its first World Series in 1915. Unfortunately, the Phillies lost the Series to Boston. One of Baker’s most infamous decisions came in 1917 when he traded Hall of Fame pitcher Grover Cleveland Alexander to the Chicago Cubs. Alexander had won at least 30 games in three consecutive seasons. Gerry Nugent — 1932-1943 Nugent inherited a financially troubled franchise and operated it on an extremely limited budget. The results were disastrous. The Phillies repeatedly traded useful players to raise money. The team eventually reached one of the lowest points in franchise history, including a 42-109 record in 1942. The National League eventually intervened because Nugent could no longer support the club financially. William Cox — 1943 William Cox purchased the Phillies in 1943 but was quickly removed from baseball after an investigation determined that he had bet on Phillies games. He was banned from baseball. The Carpenter Family — 1943-1981 The Carpenter family changed the Phillies more than any ownership group before or since. R. R. M. Carpenter Sr. purchased the club in November 1943, with his son Bob Carpenter Jr. becoming president. The Carpenter family owned the Phillies for nearly four decades, the longest ownership period by a single family in franchise history. Bob Carpenter and general manager Herb Pennock began building a farm system that eventually produced the famous Whiz Kids. The organization developed players such as: Richie Ashburn, Robin Roberts, Curt Simmons, Granny Hamner, Del Ennis The Phillies won the 1950 National League pennant with this young team. Later, under Ruly Carpenter, the organization developed another championship nucleus. Ruly Carpenter became president in 1972. His leadership helped produce the 1980 championship team, built around players such as: Mike Schmidt,  Steve Carlton Greg Luzinski Larry Bowa Bob Boone Bake McBride The Phillies won their first World Series in 1980. Bill Giles Ownership Group — 1981-1997 After the 1981 season, the Carpenter family sold the Phillies to a group headed by executive Bill Giles. The sale price was approximately $30.175 million. The ownership structure later included other prominent Philadelphia investors. David Montgomery Era David Montgomery became president and limited partner in 1997. He became one of the most respected figures in modern Phillies history and remained an important part of the organization during the franchise’s return to prominence. John Middleton and the Current Ownership John Middleton became the Phillies’ control person and managing partner in 2016. The Phillies remain organized as a limited partnership. Middleton is the club’s managing partner and controls the organization’s baseball operations from an ownership standpoint. Every Major Phillies Home Ballpark The Phillies have played in a remarkable number of Philadelphia ballparks. Recreation Park — 1883-1886 This was the site of the Phillies’ first home game. The original park was located near 24th Street and Ridge Avenue. Philadelphia Baseball Grounds — 1887-1894 The Phillies moved into a larger facility in 1887. It was destroyed by fire in 1894. University of Pennsylvania — 1894 The Phillies temporarily used the University of Pennsylvania’s athletic grounds after the fire. Columbia Park — 1903 The Phillies temporarily played at Columbia Park during part of 1903. Baker Bowl — 1895-1938 The Baker Bowl became one of the most famous—and notorious—parks in baseball. It was originally called National League Park and later… Continue reading The Philadelphia Phillies: A Complete History

GUN CONTROL: IS IT NEEDED? PART 3

Welcome back. I have taken a little longer on this part.  I really wanted to know more about how gun control has worked for the countries, (and our own states with gun control). This is what I found out. It appears that the first steps taken by dictators is to seize full control is to:  Suppress the basic freedoms.  RELIGION, SPEECH, and RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.  We have already experienced attempt at all of these.  The Supreme Court has taken it upon itself to MAKE/ALTER, (however you want to put it), the intent of our CONSTITUTION.  Their job is to interpret not make up their own laws.  An example of this would be if I were talking to a person from say Japan.  I say, “Hello, it is nice to meet you”.   The interpreter tells this person from Japan “Hello, why don’t you go back to Japan.”   So you can see how the erosion of our basic rights IS happening.  I remember Soviet Premier Kruschev saying, “We will bury you”.  He gave no time line.  Nor method of carrying this threat out. Back to the Supreme Court Justices.  RE; the FREEDOM OF RELIGION.  The intent of this RIGHT was very simple.  The government shall not dictate any one religion.  Example would be Pennsylvania founded by Quakers.  Pennsylvania is not to make it a condition of Pennsylvania you must be Quaker to reside there.  Or Utah to require you to be Mormon to live there.  But as you have seen they have taken the whole concept and mis-construed it to say I don’t have the right to openly practice my faith in a government facility.  They did this which changed one word of the this Amendment.  They effectively changed “…FREEDOM OF RELIGION, to read.  FREEDOM FROM RELIGION.   See how one word can change the whole intent.  No they didn’t physically change the word, just the way they interpret it. New York and especially New York City, Illinois (with Chicago). Washington D.C. and all the states with strict “gun control laws”, have a higher crime rate than states with laxer gun control laws. The United Kingdom confiscated all guns, (from law abiding citizens, according to the reports I have heard), has seen a 40% rise in gun related crimes.  One English police officer said.  “…Our job is harder.  Only the criminals have guns… and they are more willing to use them.”  One example I have heard of is about a farmer named Tony Martin. The story goes like this.  Two men, actually a man and a teenager, broke into his rural home.  Fred Barras,  a 16 year old criminal had 29 convictions.  Brendan Feraon, a 30 year old criminal, had 34 convictions.  Fred Barras was fatally wounded.  The farmer was sentenced to life in prison for murder. (The charge has been reduced to manslaughter, so he will eventually be set free). (Really?  Life in prison for defending himself and his property?)  Brendan Feraon, also was shot, and was sentenced to 3 years,  but only served 18 months.  Now Fearon is using taxpayer money to sue farmer, Martin for damages.  Break into a home, then sue the victim  for damages.  It happens here.  What is wrong with this picture?  A criminal breaks into your home and then sues you for damage.  Criminal definitely has an edge here.  Authorities say Martin should not have used his gun, he should have yelled for help.  He lived on a farm with no nearby neighbors.  Who would have heard his cries for help at 2 in the morning.  Those of us who live in towns and cities,  Do you think someone in the house next door would hear you, or if they did; would they come to help you, or even call the police.  Odds are the answer is NO! Australia, banned guns in 1996.  The result there is as follows.  ARMED ROBBERY, up 69%.  ASSAULTS WITH GUNS, up 28%.  GUN MURDERS, up 19%.  HOME INVASIONS up 21%.  So, instead of a decrease in crime we see an overall increase, of 137%  The town of Kennesaw Georgia, actually passed a law requiring every household to have a gun. They immediately saw a drastic DROP in gun related crime.  I don’t think I would like being told I had to own a gun, but I understand this law is not strictly enforced.  But for the most part criminals will not risk being confronted with someone with a gun An unknown is just how much crime goes unreported.  If there is no loss, or anything, (NO FOUL, NO HARM).  No report. My conclusion regarding gun control is I AM AGAINST IT!  Like (it seems is the majority of US citizens).  I  feel there should be some sort of control.  But I really have no answer.  The gun control I am against is the one which wants to take THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS OF LAW ABIDING CITIZENS away. The gun control to keep GUNS or any WEAPON out of the hands of CRIMINALS.  That is the big problem.  Law abiding citizens will obey laws.  Criminals have no such regard for the Law.  There will always be a black market.  (A criminal element.)  Criminals do not care where or how they get anything they want.  For example, on the black market,  a gun which normally sells for $600.oo may fetch upwards of $1500.oo.  Where will the law breakers get that kind of money?  Unlike you or me, and save up the money.  They will steal it from the unarmed citizen. They will sell dope to your kids.  Or they may even kill to get a gun.  The police aren’t even exempt.  They will still have guns.  Simply walk up to one as a normal citizen, take a knife and stab or slit his throat.   Now he has a gun and some ammunition.  That is how dangerous the situation could get.  One gun in  the wrong hands, by this means, makes it easier to get more guns.  A criminal will really have the… Continue reading GUN CONTROL: IS IT NEEDED? PART 3